Monday, September 17, 2012

Do you believe journalists report the truth? Why or why not?


I do believe journalists should report the truth, and solely that. Unfortunately, journalists nowadays treat the public as children, where making the public happy or pleased is the only goal in mind. Saying the tough stuff and reporting the stories that the public will have a hard time swallowing is a rare occurrence in modern day journalism. Rather, water-downed stories, where the significant and painful details are softened around the edges seem to crop up on every broadcasts and news columns. Journalists are behaving as the stereotypical parents that are afraid of their children being unhappy with them, or just unhappy in general. This then drives the parent or journalist to sugarcoat things and avoid addressing the real situation at hand.




I feel like the purpose of journalism or the understanding of the purpose of journalism has become swayed overtime. It seems as though journalism is no longer trying to report news and provide the public with truth and information; rather, journalism has become a mode of offering the public what it wants to hear. This transformation of the fundamental understanding of the purpose of journalism has enhanced and increased the number of readers and viewers, yet diminished the amount of quality, hard-factual news—the tough medicine good parents and journalists realize is what children and the public actually need. The spoon-fed stories can only go so far as to please, yet the raw, unaltered stories update the public on what they need to know. 

No comments:

Post a Comment